Home » Judgments » Lahore High Court
Dowry delivery must be proved; custom and purchase receipts are not enough
Farrukh Altaf v. Mst. Sadia Anam etc. Lahore High Court W.P. No. 930 of 2023 2026 LHC 8119 Decided Justice Anwaar Hussain (Rawalpindi Bench)
Judgment at a glance
- Legal issue
- Can the custom of giving dowry, an itemised inventory and purchase receipts prove that particular dowry articles were delivered to the husband's family, where delivery is denied?
- Decision
- No, not by themselves. Section 17 relaxes the rules of proof but does not dispense with proof: credible oral evidence can establish a dowry claim without receipts, but the court must still find that the particular articles were delivered. Here the parties lived in the USA, the receipts were in relatives' names and from other places, the claim came years after a US divorce, and the mother testifying as attorney was uncertain about delivery. The appellate decree, which relied on custom, was set aside and the trial court's dismissal restored.
- Key principle
- Custom may explain why dowry was given but cannot, without supporting evidence, establish what was given; family courts must assess the particular articles, their delivery and retention on the evidence, using the Court's eight non-exhaustive guidelines (para 8), and distinguish articles proved from those not proved.
- Outcome
- Allowed
- Relevant law
- Family Courts Act 1964, s.17; Constitution of Pakistan 1973, Art. 199
- Why it matters
- Plead each item and prove its delivery: who carried it, where, to whom and when, with a witness who saw it.
- Receipts are not required, but where produced they must be linked to the articles claimed; an attorney can speak only to what they personally know.
- Courts should allow the articles proved and reject only those not proved, rather than accept or reject a whole list.
Cite as: Farrukh Altaf v. Mst. Sadia Anam etc., 2026 LHC 8119, Lahore High Court, W.P. No. 930 of 2023, decided 8 October 2026
Case details
- Case
- Farrukh Altaf v. Mst. Sadia Anam etc.
- Court
- Lahore High Court
- Bench
- Justice Anwaar Hussain (Rawalpindi Bench)
- Date of decision
- Case number
- W.P. No. 930 of 2023
- Citation
- 2026 LHC 8119
- Outcome
- Allowed
- Statutes considered
- Family Courts Act 1964, s.17; Constitution of Pakistan 1973, Art. 199
- Topics
- Dowry
Sources
- Official text
- Judgment PDF (court website)
- Our saved copy
- PDF, saved
- How this summary was made
- Summary from the full judgment
- Official text read on
- Note on the text
- The parties married in December 2002, lived in the USA and were divorced by consent there on 24 December 2008; the dowry suit was filed on 19 June 2012. The trial court dismissed it on 3 October 2022 and the appellate court decreed it on 30 November 2022. Heard and announced on 8 October 2026; finalised on 24 October 2026. Approved for reporting. Short summary checked against the judgment; the Court's eight guidelines on assessing dowry claims are at para 8.
- Cite this summary
- PK-Legal & Associates, "Dowry delivery must be proved; custom and purchase receipts are not enough", summary of Farrukh Altaf v. Mst. Sadia Anam etc., 2026 LHC 8119, Lahore High Court, W.P. No. 930 of 2023, decided 8 October 2026, https://pklegal.org/judgments/lhc-2026-8119-dowry-delivery/ (reviewed 3 November 2026).
