Home » Judgments » Guardians and Wards Act 1890 » s.17
Judgments on s.17, Guardians and Wards Act 1890 (2026)
Pakistani court judgments that consider s.17, Guardians and Wards Act 1890, summarised in plain English, newest first. Each gives the issue, what the court held and what it means in practice, and is reviewed by an advocate.
2 judgments
A child’s preference must be heard, but within the whole welfare inquiry
Kashif Mehmood v. Saadia Fida etc.
Issue: How much weight should a court give a child's own preference in a custody case?
Held: A child capable of forming an intelligent preference must be meaningfully heard, but that preference is weighed with the child's existing care, education, stability and overall welfare rather than treated as a binding or isolated choice. Maternal custody and the…
s.17, Guardians and Wards Act 1890s.25, Guardians and Wards Act 1890
Children taken by force are returned to the mother pending the Guardian Court
Naseem Bibi v. Addl. Sessions Judge Sheikhupura and four others
Issue: Can a Sessions Judge refuse a mother's section 491 petition only because her children (about 16, 11 and 9) are not of…
Held: No. Section 491 also covers custody that is 'improper', and the remedy is not barred because the Guardian Court is available. The mother came to court at once alleging the father had forcibly taken the children from her on 20…
Art. 199, Constitution of Pakistan 1973s.17, Guardians and Wards Act 1890s.25, Guardians and Wards Act 1890s.491, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898